The Property DecisionEvery step of a move, costed honestly

Renting

Insurance In A Rented Home And Who Covers What

A landlord insures the building and their own risks, a tenant insures their possessions and their liability, and the gap between the two is where uninsured losses happen.

Close-up of a man's hands signing a formal document indoors.
Photograph by Cytonn Photography via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Figures, rates and rules change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

Two policies usually exist on a rented home, bought by different people for different reasons. Neither covers the other's losses, and neither is obliged to.

The landlord's cover protects the asset

A landlord insures the structure, fixtures and, where relevant, the furnishings they supplied. The policy responds to damage to the building rather than to the household living in it.

It also typically covers the landlord's liability as owner, loss of rent following an insured event that makes the property uninhabitable, and sometimes alternative accommodation costs in those circumstances.

A standard owner-occupier policy is generally not valid where a property is let, which is why landlords hold a distinct product and why an undeclared letting can void cover.

Tenant possessions are not included

A fire or an escape of water that destroys a tenant's belongings is not a claim on the landlord's policy unless the landlord is legally responsible for causing it.

Tenants frequently assume otherwise, because the building is repaired and the sofa in it is not. The building was insured by its owner; the sofa was not insured by anyone.

Tenant contents policies exist for this, and they are usually modest in cost relative to the value of replacing an entire household of possessions at once.

Liability runs in both directions

A tenant can cause damage to the building or to a neighbouring flat, most commonly through an overflow or a fire. Tenant liability cover addresses that exposure.

Without it, the landlord's insurer may repair the damage and then pursue the tenant for the cost, which is a mechanism many tenants only learn about afterwards.

Damage to the landlord's own fixtures beyond fair wear is separately relevant to the tenancy deposit, so the same event can raise two different claims.

Where cover quietly lapses

Policies contain conditions about occupancy, security and the property being left empty. A tenancy that ends and leaves a flat vacant for a period can move it outside cover.

Business use, subletting and additional occupants can all affect the risk a landlord declared, which is one practical reason those things require permission.

Conditions differ between insurers and between jurisdictions, and they are revised, so both parties are relying on their own documents rather than on general expectation.

What to establish at the start

A tenant benefits from asking, in writing, what the landlord's policy covers and what the tenant is expected to insure, then insuring that.

Recording the condition and contents of the property at the outset supports any later claim, because insurers ask what was there and what state it was in.

Where a block has a building policy arranged by a freeholder, the responsibility chain includes a third party, and a tenant reporting damage may need the landlord to act rather than the insurer directly.

Questions readers ask

Do I need permission to let my own home?

Usually yes if it is mortgaged, and often from the freeholder if it is a leasehold flat. Letting without consent can breach the mortgage or the lease.

Is my existing insurance enough if I let the property?

Almost certainly not. Owner-occupier cover generally does not extend to letting, and not telling the insurer risks a declined claim.

Rentingrentinglandlordconsentobligations
Gareth Pryce
Editor, The Property Decision

Gareth edits The Property Decision and has sat through more chains collapsing than he cares to count.

Also by Gareth Pryce